References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 3–22.

Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231–246.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011a). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. Internet & Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011b). Learning and satisfaction in online communities of inquiry. In S. B. Eom & J. B. Arbaugh (Eds.), Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in e-learning: An introduction to empirical research (pp. 23–35). Hershey, PA: Information Science.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011c). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250.

Alverno College. (2001). Assessment essentials: Definition of terms. Available online at: http://depts.alverno.edu/saal/terms.html

American Association of Higher Education and Accreditation. (1996). Nine principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Available online at: http://www.niu.edu/assessment/Manual/_docs/9Principles.pdf

Amirault, R. J., & Visser, Y. L. (2009). The university in periods of technological change: A historically grounded perspective. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(1), 62–79.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 1–21.

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C, & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.

Barkley, E. F. (2009). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Beckman, M. (1990). Collaborative learning: Preparation for the workplace and democracy. College Teaching, 38(4), 128–133.

Bierly, P. E., Stark, E. M., & Kessler, E. H. (2009). The moderating effects of virtuality on the antecedents and outcome of NPD team trust. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 551–565.

Biggs, J. (1998). Assumptions underlying new approaches to assessment. In P. Stimson & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum and assessment in Hong Kong: Two components, one system, (pp. 351–384). Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press.

Bonk, C., Kim, K., & Zeng, X. (2004). Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 550–568). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

Boston, W., Diaz, S. R., Gibson, A., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67–83.

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.

Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 17–32.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (March), 3–7.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (Eds.). (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Emes, C. (2005). Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Journal, 42(2), 241-262.

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2009). The role of learner in an online community of inquiry: Instructor support for first-time online learners. In N. Karacapilidis (Ed.), Solutions and innovations in web-based technologies for augmented learning: Improved platforms, tools and applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Higher education and post-industrial society: New ideas about teaching, learning, and technology. In L. Moller & J. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning. New York: Springer.

Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, R., & Kinsel, E. (2008). The role of learner in an online community of inquiry: Responding to the challenges of first-time online learners. In N. Karacapilidis (Ed.), Solutions and innovations in web-based technologies for augmented learning: Improved platforms, tools and applications. Hersey, PA: IGI Global.

Clifford, P., Friesen, S., & Lock, J. (2004). Coming to teach in the 21st century: A research study conducted by the Galileo Education Network for Alberta Learning. Available online from: http://www.galileo.org/research/publications/ctt.pdf

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.

Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 14–26.

Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P. D., Bradford, G. R., Brophy-Ellison, J., & Groff, A. T. (2010). Constructs that impact the net generation’s satisfaction with online learning. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham, & S. De Freitas (Eds.), Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners are shaping their own experiences. New York, NY: Routledge.

Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, XV (pp. 156–218). New York: Agathon.

Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, (169–194).

Eom, S. (2006). The role of instructors as a determinant of students’ satisfaction in university online education. In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies – ICALT (985–988). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

Foundation Coalition. (2002). Peer assessment and peer evaluation. Available online at: http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/brochures/2002peer_assessment.pdf

Galileo Educational Network. (2011). What is inquiry? Available online at: http://www.galileo.org/inquiry-what.html

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 1–14.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.

Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among cognitive, social and teaching presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Geerdink, C. (2012, June 26). Learning to know: It’s all about curiousity. (Web log comment). Available online at: http://www.neth-er.eu/en/news/learning-know-it%E2%80%99s-all-about-curiosity

Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 23–36). London, UK: Routledge.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.

Ginsberg, B. (2011). The fall of the faculty: The rise of the all-administrative university and why it matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., and Trumper, R. (2006). Campus-based university students’ use of dialogue. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 71–87.

Hadjerrouit S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education, 7(2), 181–210.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

Hedberg, J., & Corrent-Agostinho, S. (1999). Creating a postgraduate virtual community: Assessment drives learning. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. (pp. 1093–1098). AACE: Chesapeake, VA. Available online at: http://www.editlib.org/p/7040

Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE–FRIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.

Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Available online at: www.nmc.org/pdf/2010-Horizon-Report.pdf

Joubert, J. (1983). The notebooks of Joseph Joubert. (P. Auster, Ed. & Trans.). New York: North Point Press. (Original work published in 1842.)

Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 8. Available online at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/kanuka.html

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today’s Internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.

Keller, G. (2008). Higher education and the new society. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Knowles, M. S. (1986). Using learning contracts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Scuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (2005). Student success in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith. A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. New York: Addison-Wesley.

Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1984) Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y. G., & Smith, D. A. F. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available online at: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

Ouimet, J. A., & Smallwood, R. A. (2005). CLASSE–the class-level survey of student engagement. Assessment Update, 17(6), 13-15.

Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Pelz, B. (2004). (My) three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(3), 33–46.

Perry, W. G., Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering, The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pond, W. K. (2002, Summer). Distributed education in the 21st century: Implications for quality assurance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(2). Available online at: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer52/pond52.html

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London Series in Educational Innovation: Routledge.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. (1996). Clay Patrick Bedford. Available online at: http://www.rpi.edu/about/hof/bedford.html

Rowntree, D. (1977). Assessing students. London: Harper & Row.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Cognitive presence and online learner engagement: A cluster analysis of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 199–217.

Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4), 59–82.

Sitzman, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Adding a web-based perspective to the self-assessment of knowledge: Compelling reasons to utilize affective measures of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191.

Smith, S., Salaway, G., & Borreson Caruso, J. (2009). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2009: Key findings. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.

Teaching, Learning, and Technology (TLT) Group. (2011). Rubrics: Definition, tools, examples, references. Available online at: http://www.tltgroup.org/resources/flashlight/rubrics.htm

Team-Based Learning Collaborative. (2011). Getting started with TBL. Available online at: http://www.teambasedlearning.org/

Thistlethwaite, J. (2006). More thoughts on ‘assessment drives learning’. Medical Education, 40(11), 1149–1150.

Tinney, J. (2013). A senior administrator’s view of technology and learning. Education Canada, 53(4), Available online at: http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/senior-administrator%E2%80%99s-view-technology-and-learning

US Department of Education. (2005). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law, and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington: USDE.

Vaughan, N. D. (2008). The use of wikis and weblogs to support deep approaches to learning. The University College of Fraser Valley Research Review, 1(3), 47–60. Available online at: http://journals.ucfv.ca/rr/RR13/article-PDFs/6-vaughan.pdf

Vaughan, N. D. (2010a). A blended community of inquiry approach: Linking student engagement to course redesign. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 60–65.

Vaughan, N. D. (2010b). How can students improve their academic course work through the use of interactive learning technologies? Paper presented at the 2010 Canadian Society for Studies in Education (CSSE) Conference.

Yeh, S. S. (2009). The cost-effectiveness of raising teacher quality. Educational Research Review, 4(3), 220–232.