Skip to main content

Political Activist Ethnography: Part 3. Frontline Research and the Ethics of Engagement

Political Activist Ethnography
Part 3. Frontline Research and the Ethics of Engagement
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomePolitical Activist Ethnography
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Introduction: Institutional Ethnography and Political Activist Ethnography in Context
  3. Part 1. Direct Action: The Sociology of Confrontation
    1. 1. “Don’t Study Us—Study Them”: Political Activist Ethnography and Activist Ethics in Practice
    2. 2. Direct Action as Political Activist Ethnography: Activist Research in the Sudbury Coalition Against Poverty
    3. 3. Looking into the Mouth of Premier David Alward’s Trojan Horse: Responsible Environmental Management of Shale Gas in New Brunswick, Canada
    4. 4. Research from the Ground Up: Reflections on Activist Research Practice and Political Activist Ethnography
  4. Part 2. Research as Policy Intervention and Critique of Institutions
    1. 5. From an Institutional Absence to Radical Action: A Political Activist Ethnography Project in Aotearoa / New Zealand
    2. 6. North-South Partnership and Capacity Building: Tracing Ruling Relations in the Canadian-Bangladeshi Partnership Between Social Justice NGOs
    3. 7. Mandatory HIV Screening Policy and Everyday Life: A Look Inside the Canadian Immigration Medical Examination
  5. Part 3. Frontline Research and the Ethics of Engagement
    1. 8. Studying Out: Institutional Ethnographic Fieldwork as Post-incarceration Activism
    2. 9. Double Ethics, Double Burden: Professionalism, Activism, and Institutional Ethnography
    3. 10. Objectivity Regimes: Challenges for Activist Research in the Academy
    4. Conclusion
  6. Postscript: Looking Back, Looking Forward
  7. List of Contributors

Part 3. Frontline Research and the Ethics of Engagement | Political Activist Ethnography | AU Press—Digital Publications

Part 3 Frontline Research and the Ethics of Engagement

This third section discusses the possibilities and limitations of institutional ethnography–infused advocacy. The authors whose work is featured here might be considered outsiders to activism, while some are trained professionals with experience working within large bureaucracies. The glue that binds them is their close consideration of how to build activist-professional partnerships to make it possible for the researcher-professional to do activist research.

Megan Welsh Carroll’s IE-infused advocacy project “Studying Out: Institutional Ethnographic Fieldwork as Post-incarceration Activism” plunges us into a web of ruling relations that formerly incarcerated women are drawn into during their post-incarceration work. In addition to showing how social scientists can do fieldwork as activism, she reveals how advocates might use fieldwork to pinpoint where institutional changes are warranted. In this way, her research offers prison activist movements a chance to build fieldwork into their ongoing work.

Agnieszka Doll’s “Double Ethics, Double Burden: Professionalism, Activism, and Institutional Ethnography” focuses on the possibilities and challenges of IE-infused advocacy research. She grapples with the complications arising when the activist is also a lawyer occupying the dual position of researcher-professional and advocate during fieldwork in a psychiatric hospital.

In the final chapter, “Objectivity Regimes: Challenges for Activist Research in the Academy,” informed by political activist ethnography, Shannon Walsh explores how activists working in the academy respond to demands for so-called professional objectivity in academic research and to the possibility that assumptions about race, gender, and class privilege may find their way into studies if practitioners rely on academic methodology alone. Walsh raises important questions related to research and ethics, challenging the objectivity regime in academia that divides more than it unifies people in struggle.

Annotate

Next Chapter
8. Studying Out: Institutional Ethnographic Fieldwork as Post-incarceration Activism
PreviousNext
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). It may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that the original author is credited.
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org
Manifold uses cookies

We use cookies to analyze our traffic. Please decide if you are willing to accept cookies from our website. You can change this setting anytime in Privacy Settings.